↓ Skip to main content

The role of GDNF family ligand signalling in the differentiation of sympathetic and dorsal root ganglion neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The role of GDNF family ligand signalling in the differentiation of sympathetic and dorsal root ganglion neurons
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00441-008-0634-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uwe Ernsberger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 31%
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 32%
Neuroscience 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#615
of 2,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,560
of 100,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.