You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Assembling Genomes and Mini-metagenomes from Highly Chimeric Reads
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Research in Computational Molecular Biology
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-37195-0_13 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-237194-3, 978-3-64-237195-0
|
| Authors |
Sergey Nurk, Anton Bankevich, Dmitry Antipov, Alexey Gurevich, Anton Korobeynikov, Alla Lapidus, Andrey Prjibelsky, Alexey Pyshkin, Alexander Sirotkin, Yakov Sirotkin, Ramunas Stepanauskas, Jeffrey McLean, Roger Lasken, Scott R. Clingenpeel, Tanja Woyke, Glenn Tesler, Max A. Alekseyev, Pavel A. Pevzner, Nurk, Sergey, Bankevich, Anton, Antipov, Dmitry, Gurevich, Alexey, Korobeynikov, Anton, Lapidus, Alla, Prjibelsky, Andrey, Pyshkin, Alexey, Sirotkin, Alexander, Sirotkin, Yakov, Stepanauskas, Ramunas, McLean, Jeffrey, Lasken, Roger, Clingenpeel, Scott R., Woyke, Tanja, Tesler, Glenn, Alekseyev, Max A., Pevzner, Pavel A. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 538 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 523 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 126 | 23% |
| Researcher | 89 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 74 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 13% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 11% |
| Unknown | 100 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 155 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 134 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 35 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 11% |
| Unknown | 116 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,195
of 8,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,900
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#154
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.