↓ Skip to main content

Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
8 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
374 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain
Published in
European Spine Journal, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00586-008-0770-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tue Secher Jensen, Jaro Karppinen, Joan S. Sorensen, Jaakko Niinimäki, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde

Abstract

The prevalence of "vertebral endplate signal changes" (VESC) and its association with low back pain (LBP) varies greatly between studies. This wide range in reported prevalence rates and associations with LBP could be explained by differences in the definitions of VESC, LBP, or study sample. The objectives of this systematic critical review were to investigate the current literature in relation to the prevalence of VESC (including Modic changes) and the association with non-specific low back pain (LBP). The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SveMED databases were searched for the period 1984 to November 2007. Included were the articles that reported the prevalence of VESC in non-LBP, general, working, and clinical populations. Included were also articles that investigated the association between VESC and LBP. Articles on specific LBP conditions were excluded. A checklist including items related to the research questions and overall quality of the articles was used for data collection and quality assessment. The reported prevalence rates were studied in relation to mean age, gender, study sample, year of publication, country of study, and quality score. To estimate the association between VESC and LBP, 2 x 2 tables were created to calculate the exact odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Eighty-two study samples from 77 original articles were identified and included in the analysis. The median of the reported prevalence rates for any type of VESC was 43% in patients with non-specific LBP and/or sciatica and 6% in non-clinical populations. The prevalence was positively associated with age and was negatively associated with the overall quality of the studies. A positive association between VESC and non-specific LBP was found in seven of ten studies from the general, working, and clinical populations with ORs from 2.0 to 19.9. This systematic review shows that VESC is a common MRI-finding in patients with non-specific LBP and is associated with pain. However, it should be noted that VESC may be present in individuals without LBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 257 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Researcher 35 13%
Other 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Student > Master 22 8%
Other 80 30%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,696,846
of 25,307,660 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#137
of 5,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,172
of 97,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.