↓ Skip to main content

Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization in Orthopaedic Surgery and Reduction of Surgical Site Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization in Orthopaedic Surgery and Reduction of Surgical Site Infections
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2875-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia F. Chen, Charles B. Wessel, Nalini Rao

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common organism responsible for orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSIs). Patients who are carriers for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have a higher likelihood of having invasive S. aureus infections. Although some have advocated screening for S. aureus and decolonizing it is unclear whether these efforts reduce SSIs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Engineering 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,930,204
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,877
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,056
of 207,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#19
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.