↓ Skip to main content

Gender differences in neurodevelopment and epigenetics

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Gender differences in neurodevelopment and epigenetics
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00424-013-1258-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilson C. J. Chung, Anthony P. Auger

Abstract

The concept that the brain differs in make-up between males and females is not new. For example, it is well established that anatomists in the nineteenth century found sex differences in human brain weight. The importance of sex differences in the organization of the brain cannot be overstated as they may directly affect cognitive functions, such as verbal skills and visuospatial tasks in a sex-dependent fashion. Moreover, the incidence of neurological and psychiatric diseases is also highly dependent on sex. These clinical observations reiterate the importance that gender must be taken into account as a relevant possible contributing factor in order to understand the pathogenesis of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Gender-dependent differentiation of the brain has been detected at every level of organization--morphological, neurochemical, and functional--and has been shown to be primarily controlled by sex differences in gonadal steroid hormone levels during perinatal development. In this review, we discuss howthe gonadal steroid hormone testosterone and its metabolites affect downstream signaling cascades, including gonadal steroid receptor activation, and epigenetic events in order to differentiate the brain in a gender-dependent fashion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Master 19 15%
Professor 16 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 18%
Neuroscience 22 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,314,254
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#177
of 2,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,833
of 210,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.