↓ Skip to main content

Bristle-like integumentary structures at the tail of the horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
38 Wikipedia pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Bristle-like integumentary structures at the tail of the horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus
Published in
The Science of Nature, July 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00114-002-0339-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald Mayr, Stefan D. Peters, Gerhard Plodowski, Olaf Vogel

Abstract

A specimen of the horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus from the early Cretaceous of China is described in which the integument is extraordinarily well-preserved. Most unusual is the presence of long bristle-like structures on the proximal part of tail. We interpret these structures as cylindrical and possibly tubular epidermal structures that were anchored deeply in the skin. They might have been used in display behavior and especially if one assumes that they were colored, they may have had a signal function. At present, there is no convincing evidence which shows these structures to be homologous to the structurally different integumentary filaments of theropod dinosaurs. Independent of their homology, however, the discovery of bristle-like structures in Psittacosaurus is of great evolutionary significance since it shows that the integumentary covering of at least some dinosaurs was much more complex than has ever been previously imagined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 128 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 73 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 35%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 14 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#822,306
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#107
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#451
of 37,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.