↓ Skip to main content

Chronic heart failure guidelines: Do they adequately address patient need at the end-of-life?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cardiology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic heart failure guidelines: Do they adequately address patient need at the end-of-life?
Published in
International Journal of Cardiology, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.189
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Irving, J. Holden, J. Edwards, J. Reeve, C. Dowrick, M. Lloyd-Williams

Abstract

A number of international guidelines have been developed to support primary care clinicians improve the quality of care for patients with chronic heart failure at the end of life. The objective of this study was to undertake a systematic evaluation of such guidelines in relation to end-of-life care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#19,917,643
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cardiology
#5,392
of 7,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,424
of 207,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cardiology
#52
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.