Title |
Birkhoff’s aesthetic ratio as a morphometric tool in the analysis of anatomical development of biological tree-like structures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Zoomorphology, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00435-012-0171-2 |
Authors |
Julio Gil, Miguel Gimeno, Jesús Laborda, Javier Nuviala, Rafael Lahoz-Beltra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 36% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
Computer Science | 2 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,185,720
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Zoomorphology
#365
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,217
of 170,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoomorphology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.