↓ Skip to main content

Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
493 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
525 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images
Published in
NeuroImage, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.045
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Raffelt, J.-Donald Tournier, Stephen Rose, Gerard R. Ridgway, Robert Henderson, Stuart Crozier, Olivier Salvado, Alan Connelly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 493 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 26%
Researcher 107 20%
Student > Master 70 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Student > Bachelor 28 5%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 78 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 125 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 12%
Engineering 49 9%
Computer Science 45 9%
Psychology 37 7%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 123 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#6,455
of 12,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,367
of 155,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#78
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.