↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Cultural and Indigenous Values in Geosite Evaluations on a Quaternary Monogenetic Volcanic Landscape at Ihumātao, Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Geoheritage, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Cultural and Indigenous Values in Geosite Evaluations on a Quaternary Monogenetic Volcanic Landscape at Ihumātao, Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand
Published in
Geoheritage, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12371-016-0198-8
Authors

Ilmars Gravis, Károly Németh, Jonathan N. Procter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 47%
Environmental Science 6 17%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,349,664
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Geoheritage
#211
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,374
of 313,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoheritage
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.