↓ Skip to main content

Thyroid cancer in Belarus post-Chernobyl: Improved detection or increased incidence?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, July 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,900)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Thyroid cancer in Belarus post-Chernobyl: Improved detection or increased incidence?
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, July 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01309218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theodor Abelin, Juri I. Averkin, Matthias Egger, Bruno Egloff, Alexander W. Furmanchuk, Felix Gurtner, Jewgeni A. Korotkevich, Arthur Marx, Ivan I. Matveyenko, Alexei E. Okeanov, Charles Ruchti, Walter Schaeppi

Abstract

There is debate on whether the reported increase in the number of cases of childhood thyroid cancer in Belarus is real and attributable to radiation released following the Chernobyl nuclear accident, or rather an artefact due to incorrect histological diagnosis, more complete case reporting and mass screening of children after the accident. We have scrutinised the histological slides of 120 (75%) of the 160 cases reported among children aged up to 15 years to the Belarus tumour registry from 1986 to 1992 and examined time trends and geographical patterns in incidence and tumour characteristics. Incidence based on reported cases increased from 0.041 per 100,000 in 1986 to 2.548 in 1992. Carcinoma was confirmed in 94% of reviewed tumours. Except for one medullary carcinoma all histologies were of the papillary type. Most of the tumours had spread beyond the organ capsule and measured over 10 mm in diameter. There was a weak and statistically non-significant trend (p = 0.19) towards smaller tumours in the later years. The proportion of cases with lymphnode or distant metastasis remained unchanged. Incidence based on histologically confirmed cases was highest adjacent and to the west and north of Chernobyl, matching best estimates of iodine-131 contamination. Our data thus strongly suggest that the observed increase is real but more data are needed in order to assess the impact of mass screening and to clarify the possible association with radiation released at Chernobyl in 1986.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Professor 3 20%
Other 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#623,050
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#47
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98
of 20,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them