↓ Skip to main content

Direct Recordings from the Auditory Cortex in a Cochlear Implant User

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Direct Recordings from the Auditory Cortex in a Cochlear Implant User
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10162-013-0382-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirill V. Nourski, Christine P. Etler, John F. Brugge, Hiroyuki Oya, Hiroto Kawasaki, Richard A. Reale, Paul J. Abbas, Carolyn J. Brown, Matthew A. Howard

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve with a cochlear implant (CI) is the method of choice for treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss. Understanding how the human auditory cortex responds to CI stimulation is important for advances in stimulation paradigms and rehabilitation strategies. In this study, auditory cortical responses to CI stimulation were recorded intracranially in a neurosurgical patient to examine directly the functional organization of the auditory cortex and compare the findings with those obtained in normal-hearing subjects. The subject was a bilateral CI user with a 20-year history of deafness and refractory epilepsy. As part of the epilepsy treatment, a subdural grid electrode was implanted over the left temporal lobe. Pure tones, click trains, sinusoidal amplitude-modulated noise, and speech were presented via the auxiliary input of the right CI speech processor. Additional experiments were conducted with bilateral CI stimulation. Auditory event-related changes in cortical activity, characterized by the averaged evoked potential and event-related band power, were localized to posterolateral superior temporal gyrus. Responses were stable across recording sessions and were abolished under general anesthesia. Response latency decreased and magnitude increased with increasing stimulus level. More apical intracochlear stimulation yielded the largest responses. Cortical evoked potentials were phase-locked to the temporal modulations of periodic stimuli and speech utterances. Bilateral electrical stimulation resulted in minimal artifact contamination. This study demonstrates the feasibility of intracranial electrophysiological recordings of responses to CI stimulation in a human subject, shows that cortical response properties may be similar to those obtained in normal-hearing individuals, and provides a basis for future comparisons with extracranial recordings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Belgium 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 88 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 28%
Researcher 21 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Engineering 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 9 9%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,081,606
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#225
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,477
of 199,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.