↓ Skip to main content

Defining Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Remission and Optimum Time for Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Withdrawal

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Defining Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Remission and Optimum Time for Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Withdrawal
Published in
Pediatric Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/11595980-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Broughton, Kate Armon

Abstract

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an autoimmune disease of childhood requiring treatment with immune modulation therapy. It runs a relapsing and remitting course, with approximately half of affected children continuing with active disease into adult life. Defining clinical remission is challenging, but necessary, as it is critical in determining when potentially toxic therapy can be stopped. We found that preliminary consensus criteria for defining JIA remission are not being used in full by a representative sample of UK pediatric rheumatologists. Extending the period of remission, whilst on synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) medication, beyond 6 months does not seem to reduce the risk of relapse once medication is stopped. However, we found that most clinicians state that they still require at least 1 year in remission before DMARD withdrawal. There is increasing evidence that subclinical biomarkers may help to assess disease activity, and therefore aid clinicians in determining remission. In this review we argue that agreement on remission criteria and optimum timing of DMARD withdrawal is crucial for consistent clinical practice, and further research in this area is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2013.
All research outputs
#19,918,696
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Drugs
#471
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,344
of 187,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Drugs
#157
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.