Title |
Using computer decision support systems in NHS emergency and urgent care: ethnographic study using normalisation process theory
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine Pope, Susan Halford, Joanne Turnbull, Jane Prichard, Melania Calestani, Carl May |
Abstract |
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are often proposed as 'technological fixes' for problems facing healthcare. They promise to deliver services more quickly and cheaply. Yet research on the implementation of ICTs reveals a litany of delays, compromises and failures. Case studies have established that these technologies are difficult to embed in everyday healthcare. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Ireland | 1 | 9% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 30 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 17% |
Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 37 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
Psychology | 8 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 36 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,924,968
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,330
of 8,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,658
of 200,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#35
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.