| Title |
More Practice, Less Preach? The Role of Supervision Processes and Therapist Characteristics in EBP Implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-013-0485-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Kate Bearman, John R. Weisz, Bruce F. Chorpita, Kimberly Hoagwood, Alyssa Ward, Ana M. Ugueto, Adam Bernstein, The Research Network on Youth Mental Health |
| Abstract |
Identifying predictors of evidence-based practice (EBP) use, such as supervision processes and therapist characteristics, may support dissemination. Therapists (N = 57) received training and supervision in EBPs to treat community-based youth (N = 136). Supervision involving modeling and role-play predicted higher overall practice use than supervision involving discussion, and modeling predicted practice use in the next therapy session. No therapist characteristics predicted practice use, but therapist sex and age moderated the supervision and practice use relation. Supervision involving discussion predicted practice use for male therapists only, and modeling and role-play in supervision predicted practice use for older, not younger, therapists. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 106 | 51% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,559,804
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#222
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,853
of 211,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.