You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lessons Learned From a Collaborative Field-Based Collection of Physical Activity Data Using Accelerometers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/phh.0b013e3182893b9b |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara F. Morris, Mary Bea Kolbe, Justin B. Moore |
| Abstract |
Recent improvements in the accuracy and availability of accelerometers present an opportunity to increase the validity of physical activity assessment. While use of these devices is now pervasive among researchers, accelerometers have not been widely used by community-based public health practitioners. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
#1,829
of 2,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,174
of 236,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.