| Title |
Laparoscopic vs open resection of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: single institution’s experience over 14 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00423-007-0255-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew A. Gumbs, Philippe Grès, Fabio Madureira, Brice Gayet |
| Abstract |
Laparoscopic resection of benign pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) has become the standard of care for tumors in the pancreatic tail. Over a 14-year period, we have resected both benign and malignant tumors of the entire pancreas laparoscopically and compared our survival and complication rates with open controls. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2011.
All research outputs
#20,185,720
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#870
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,416
of 156,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.