↓ Skip to main content

Fatal disseminated cowpox virus infection in an adolescent renal transplant recipient

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Fatal disseminated cowpox virus infection in an adolescent renal transplant recipient
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00467-016-3534-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Gazzani, Joanna E Gach, Isabel Colmenero, Jeff Martin, Hugh Morton, Kevin Brown, David V Milford

Abstract

A 17-year-old boy on long-term immunosuppression following renal transplantation for chronic kidney disease (CKD), the result of dysplastic kidneys, initially presented with a swelling in his neck while attending hospital for an unrelated problem. A clinical diagnosis of tonsillitis was made, and he was treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Over a few days, his condition deteriorated, and he developed multiple vesicopustular skin lesions and required an emergency tonsillectomy due to respiratory distress. Histological investigation of the skin and tonsillar tissue suggested a viral aetiology, and subsequent electron microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tissue examination proved disseminated cowpox infection. The family cat, which was reported as having self-resolving sores on its skin, was likely the source of the infection. The child failed to respond to antiviral treatment and succumbed to multiorgan failure within a month of admission. We report this case of fatal disseminated cowpox infection to highlight an increasing risk of this illness in the post-transplant population and to detail some unusual features not previously described, such as tonsillar involvement, disseminated skin lesions and multiorgan failure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,701,130
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,552
of 3,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,959
of 319,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#19
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.