↓ Skip to main content

Spatial Subsidies, Trophic State, and Community Structure: Examining the Effects of Leaf Litter Input on Ponds

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Spatial Subsidies, Trophic State, and Community Structure: Examining the Effects of Leaf Litter Input on Ponds
Published in
Ecosystems, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9639-2
Authors

Julia E. Earl, Raymond D. Semlitsch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Cambodia 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 48%
Environmental Science 27 31%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,571,743
of 24,379,758 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#1,030
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,090
of 200,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,379,758 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.