| Title |
Caatinga, the Brazilian dry tropical forest: can it tolerate climate changes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40626-014-0008-0 |
| Authors |
Mauro G. Santos, Marciel T. Oliveira, Karla V. Figueiredo, Hiram M. Falcão, Emília C. P. Arruda, Jarcilene Almeida-Cortez, Everardo V. S. B. Sampaio, Jean P. H. B. Ometto, Rômulo S. C. Menezes, Antônio F. M. Oliveira, Marcelo F. Pompelli, Antônio C. D. Antonino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 237 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 46 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#16,098,747
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology
#40
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,423
of 324,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.