↓ Skip to main content

Long-term outcome of patients with urea cycle disorders and the question of neonatal screening

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Long-term outcome of patients with urea cycle disorders and the question of neonatal screening
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00431-003-1347-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claude Bachmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,771
of 4,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,925
of 142,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.