↓ Skip to main content

If Chinese is head-initial, Japanese cannot be

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of East Asian Linguistics, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 101)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
If Chinese is head-initial, Japanese cannot be
Published in
Journal of East Asian Linguistics, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10831-009-9038-z
Authors

Kensuke Takita

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Professor 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 34 81%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#9
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,116
of 94,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them