↓ Skip to main content

Psychiatric Comorbidity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Comparison with Children with ADHD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child and Family Studies, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Psychiatric Comorbidity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Comparison with Children with ADHD
Published in
Journal of Child and Family Studies, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10826-012-9587-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisca J. A. van Steensel, Susan M. Bögels, Esther I. de Bruin

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the aim to identify comorbid psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (n = 40) and to compare those comorbidity rates to those in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 40). Participants were clinically referred children aged 7-18 years. DSM-IV classifications were used for the primary diagnosis (ASD/ADHD), while comorbid psychiatric disorders were assessed using a structured diagnostic interview, the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV, childhood diagnoses (KID-SCID). Twenty-three children with ASD (57.5 %) had at least one comorbid disorder, whereas 16 children with ADHD (40.0 %) were classified as having at least one comorbid disorder. No group differences were found with respect to this comorbidity rate or for the rate of comorbid externalizing disorders (ODD and/or CD). However, children with ASD had more comorbid internalizing disorders compared to children with ADHD. More specifically, children with ASD had higher rates of anxiety disorders, but not mood disorders. No associations between comorbidity and age or between comorbidity and the intelligence quotient was found. It is important for clinicians to always be aware of, and screen for, comorbidity, and to consider treatment for these comorbid disorders. In addition, research should focus on establishing valid and reliable screening tools as well as effective treatment options for these comorbid disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 264 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 50 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 103 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 13%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,645,195
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#308
of 1,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,034
of 176,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.