↓ Skip to main content

School-based mindfulness training in early adolescence: what works, for whom and how in the MYRIAD trial?

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Mental Health, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 934)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1886 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
School-based mindfulness training in early adolescence: what works, for whom and how in the MYRIAD trial?
Published in
BMJ Mental Health, July 2022
DOI 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300439
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesus Montero-Marin, Matthew Allwood, Susan Ball, Catherine Crane, Katherine De Wilde, Verena Hinze, Benjamin Jones, Liz Lord, Elizabeth Nuthall, Anam Raja, Laura Taylor, Kate Tudor, MYRIAD Team, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Sarah Byford, Tim Dalgleish, Tamsin Ford, Mark T Greenberg, Obioha C Ukoumunne, J Mark G Williams, Willem Kuyken, MYRIAD Team, Saz Ahmed, Louise Aukland, Marc Bennett, Triona Casey, Nicola Dalrymple, Eleanor-Rose Farley, Katie Fletcher, Lucy Foulkes, Kirsty Griffiths, Cait Griffin, Jennifer Harper, Nils Kappelmann, Maria Kempnich, Konstantina Komninidou, Rachel Knight, Suzannah Laws, Jovita Leung, Emma Medlicott, Lucy Palmer, Jenna Parker, Ariane Petit, Alice Philips, Blanca Piera Pi-Sunyer, Isobel Pryor-Nitsch, Lucy Radley, Jem Shackleford, Ashok Sakhardande, Elise Sellars, Anna Sonley, Alice Tickell, Maris Vainre, Lucy Warriner, Brian Wainman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,886 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 10 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 80 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 26%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Unspecified 8 4%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 83 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1340. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#9,832
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Mental Health
#2
of 934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389
of 438,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Mental Health
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.