↓ Skip to main content

Chronic stress-induced disruption of the astrocyte network is driven by structural atrophy and not loss of astrocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Chronic stress-induced disruption of the astrocyte network is driven by structural atrophy and not loss of astrocytes
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00401-013-1102-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ross J. Tynan, Sarah B. Beynon, Madeleine Hinwood, Sarah J. Johnson, Michael Nilsson, Jason J. Woods, Frederick R. Walker

Abstract

Chronic stress is well recognized to decrease the number of GFAP⁺ astrocytes within the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Recent research, however, has suggested that our understanding of how stress alters astrocytes may be incomplete. Specifically, chronic stress has been shown to induce a unique form of microglial remodelling, but it is not yet clear whether astrocytes also undergo similar structural modifications. Such alterations may be significant given the role of astrocytes in modulating synaptic function. Accordingly, in the current study we have examined changes in astrocyte morphology following exposure to chronic stress in adult rats, using three-dimensional digital reconstructions of astrocytes. Our analysis indicated that chronic stress produced profound atrophy of astrocyte process length, branching and volume. We additionally examined changes in astrocyte-specific S100β, which are both a putative astrocyte marker and a protein whose expression is associated with astrocyte distress. While we found that S100β levels were increased by stress, this increase was not correlated with atrophy. We further established that while chronic stress was associated with a decrease in astrocyte numbers when GFAP labelling was used as a marker, we could find no evidence of a decrease in the total number of cells, based on Nissl staining, or in the number of S100β⁺ cells. This finding suggests that chronic stress may not actually reduce astrocyte numbers and may instead selectively decrease GFAP expression. The results of the current study are significant as they indicate stress-induced astrocyte-mediated disturbances may not be due to a loss of cells but rather due to significant remodeling of the astrocyte network.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 65 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,267,294
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#2,094
of 2,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,595
of 197,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.