↓ Skip to main content

The vagina as a route for drug delivery: a review

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 2,913)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
The vagina as a route for drug delivery: a review
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00192-012-2009-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sushma Srikrishna, Linda Cardozo

Abstract

Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome has a significant deleterious impact on quality of life. After conservative therapy and bladder retaining, antimuscarinic drugs remain the mainstay of OAB management. Oral therapy is associated with frequent side effects, leading to the development of alternative agents and formulations or the use of novel routes of drug administration, such as the vaginal route. The vagina is often ideal for drug delivery because it allows the use of lower doses, maintains steady drug administration levels, and requires less frequent administration than the oral route. With vaginal drug administration, absorption is unaffected by gastrointestinal disturbances, there is no first-pass effect, and use is discreet. The aim of this review is to provide a background overview of vaginal development, anatomy, and physiology and the effect this has on the use of this route for both local and systemic drug delivery, with special reference to OAB management. Vaginal therapy continues to be an underused route of drug delivery. Vaginal administration allows nondaily, low, continuous dosing, which results in stable drug levels and may, in turn, achieve a lower incidence of side effects and improve patient compliance. These benefits must be balanced against inherent patient or physician bias against using this route and the need to overcome cultural, personal, and hygiene-related barriers to this form of therapy. More sophisticated and programmable vaginal rings are being developed for systemic delivery of therapeutically important macromolecules, such as antimuscarinic therapy in OAB management.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 192 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 10 5%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 64 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 47 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Engineering 9 5%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 74 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#648,631
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#24
of 2,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,521
of 287,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.