You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training compared with normal school provision in reducing risk of mental health problems and promoting well-being in adolescence: the MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Mental Health, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300396 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Willem Kuyken, Susan Ball, Catherine Crane, Poushali Ganguli, Benjamin Jones, Jesus Montero-Marin, Elizabeth Nuthall, Anam Raja, Laura Taylor, Kate Tudor, Russell M Viner, Matthew Allwood, Louise Aukland, Darren Dunning, Tríona Casey, Nicola Dalrymple, Katherine De Wilde, Eleanor-Rose Farley, Jennifer Harper, Nils Kappelmann, Maria Kempnich, Liz Lord, Emma Medlicott, Lucy Palmer, Ariane Petit, Alice Philips, Isobel Pryor-Nitsch, Lucy Radley, Anna Sonley, Jem Shackleford, Alice Tickell, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, The MYRIAD Team, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Mark T Greenberg, Tamsin Ford, Tim Dalgleish, Sarah Byford, J Mark G Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 410 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 53 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 10% |
| Japan | 24 | 6% |
| United States | 21 | 5% |
| Chile | 13 | 3% |
| Turkey | 11 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Ireland | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 213 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 320 | 78% |
| Scientists | 70 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 81 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 90 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 433. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#67,089
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Mental Health
#7
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,088
of 438,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Mental Health
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.