↓ Skip to main content

Supporting weakly Pareto optimal allocations in infinite dimensional nonconvex economies

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Theory, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Supporting weakly Pareto optimal allocations in infinite dimensional nonconvex economies
Published in
Economic Theory, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00199-005-0033-y
Authors

Monique Florenzano, Pascal Gourdel, Alejandro Jofré

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 17%
Greece 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 50%
Mathematics 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Economic Theory
#72
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,466
of 58,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Theory
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.