↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of cell‐free fetal DNA in maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in a general pregnant population and in a high risk population – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of cell‐free fetal DNA in maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in a general pregnant population and in a high risk population – a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, December 2016
DOI 10.1111/aogs.13047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Iwarsson, Bo Jacobsson, Jessica Dagerhamn, Thomas Davidson, Eduardo Bernabé, Marianne Heibert Arnlind

Abstract

To review the performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 (T21, T18 and T13) in a general pregnant population as well as to update the data on high-risk pregnancies. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. Methodological quality was rated using QUADAS and scientific evidence using GRADE. Summary measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. In a general pregnant population, there is moderate evidence that the pooled sensitivity is 0.993 (95% 0.955 to 0.999) and specificity was 0.999 (95% 0.998 to 0.999) for the analysis of T21. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for T13 and T18 was not calculated in this population due to the low number of studies. In a high-risk pregnant population, there is moderate evidence that the pooled sensitivities for T21 and T18 are 0.998 (95% CI 0.981 to 0.999) and 0.977 (95% CI 0.958 to 0.987) respectively, and low evidence that the pooled sensitivity for T13 is 0.975 (95% CI 0.819 to 0.997). The pooled specificity for all three trisomies is 0.999 (95% 0.998 to 0.999). This is the first meta-analysis using GRADE that shows that NIPT performs well as a screen for trisomy 21 in a general pregnant population. Although the false positive rate is low compared to First Trimester Combined Screening, women should still be advised to confirm a positive result by invasive testing if termination of pregnancy is under consideration. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 18 13%
Other 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,309,208
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
#593
of 3,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,813
of 422,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.