↓ Skip to main content

Ginger (Zingiber officinale) and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ginger (Zingiber officinale) and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic literature review
Published in
Nutrition Reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/nure.12016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang M Marx, Laisa Teleni, Alexandra L McCarthy, Luis Vitetta, Dan McKavanagh, Damien Thomson, Elisabeth Isenring

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common side-effect of cytotoxic treatment. It continues to affect a significant proportion of patients despite the widespread use of antiemetic medication. In traditional medicine, ginger (Zingiber officinale) has been used to prevent and treat nausea in many cultures for thousands of years. However, its use has not been confirmed in the chemotherapy context. To determine the potential use of ginger as a prophylactic or treatment for CINV, a systematic literature review was conducted. Reviewed studies comprised randomized controlled trials or crossover trials that investigated the anti-CINV effect of ginger as the sole independent variable in chemotherapy patients. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were assessed on methodological quality and their limitations were identified. Studies were mixed in their support of ginger as an anti-CINV treatment in patients receiving chemotherapy, with three demonstrating a positive effect, two in favor but with caveats, and two showing no effect on measures of CINV. Future studies are required to address the limitations identified before clinical use can be recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 58 26%
Student > Master 28 13%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 55 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 63 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#891,843
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Reviews
#263
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,218
of 208,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Reviews
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.