↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a patient self-management programme for breast cancer as a chronic illness: a non-randomised controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a patient self-management programme for breast cancer as a chronic illness: a non-randomised controlled clinical trial
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11764-013-0274-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siew Yim Loh, Tanya Packer, Karuthan Chinna, Kia Fatt Quek

Abstract

Patient self-management enables living with a chronic disease effectively. This study examines the effectiveness of a 4-week self-management programme to enable self-management of the numerous after-effects and with breast cancer as a chronic disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Master 27 14%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Other 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 23%
Psychology 39 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 53 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,267,294
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#744
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,615
of 197,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.