↓ Skip to main content

Intervention for Infants at Risk of Developing Autism: A Case Series

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Intervention for Infants at Risk of Developing Autism: A Case Series
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1797-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Green, Ming Wai Wan, Jeanne Guiraud, Samina Holsgrove, Janet McNally, Vicky Slonims, Mayada Elsabbagh, Tony Charman, Andrew Pickles, Mark Johnson, The BASIS Team

Abstract

Theory and evidence suggest the potential value of prodromal intervention for infants at risk of developing autism. We report an initial case series (n = 8) of a parent-mediated, video-aided and interaction-focused intervention with infant siblings of autistic probands, beginning at 8-10 months of age. We outline the theory and evidence base behind this model and present data on feasibility, acceptability and measures ranging from parent-infant social interaction, to infant atypical behaviors, attention and cognition. The intervention proves to be both feasible and acceptable to families. Measurement across domains was successful and on larger samples promise to be an effective test of whether such an intervention in infancy will modify emergent atypical developmental trajectories in infants at risk for autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 20%
Student > Master 37 17%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 38%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,285,700
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,031
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,955
of 200,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#17
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.