↓ Skip to main content

Translational biomarker discovery in clinical metabolomics: an introductory tutorial

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 1,367)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
753 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
895 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Translational biomarker discovery in clinical metabolomics: an introductory tutorial
Published in
Metabolomics, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11306-012-0482-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianguo Xia, David I. Broadhurst, Michael Wilson, David S. Wishart

Abstract

Metabolomics is increasingly being applied towards the identification of biomarkers for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk prediction. Unfortunately among the many published metabolomic studies focusing on biomarker discovery, there is very little consistency and relatively little rigor in how researchers select, assess or report their candidate biomarkers. In particular, few studies report any measure of sensitivity, specificity, or provide receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves with associated confidence intervals. Even fewer studies explicitly describe or release the biomarker model used to generate their ROC curves. This is surprising given that for biomarker studies in most other biomedical fields, ROC curve analysis is generally considered the standard method for performance assessment. Because the ultimate goal of biomarker discovery is the translation of those biomarkers to clinical practice, it is clear that the metabolomics community needs to start "speaking the same language" in terms of biomarker analysis and reporting-especially if it wants to see metabolite markers being routinely used in the clinic. In this tutorial, we will first introduce the concept of ROC curves and describe their use in single biomarker analysis for clinical chemistry. This includes the construction of ROC curves, understanding the meaning of area under ROC curves (AUC) and partial AUC, as well as the calculation of confidence intervals. The second part of the tutorial focuses on biomarker analyses within the context of metabolomics. This section describes different statistical and machine learning strategies that can be used to create multi-metabolite biomarker models and explains how these models can be assessed using ROC curves. In the third part of the tutorial we discuss common issues and potential pitfalls associated with different analysis methods and provide readers with a list of nine recommendations for biomarker analysis and reporting. To help readers test, visualize and explore the concepts presented in this tutorial, we also introduce a web-based tool called ROCCET (ROC Curve Explorer & Tester, http://www.roccet.ca). ROCCET was originally developed as a teaching aid but it can also serve as a training and testing resource to assist metabolomics researchers build biomarker models and conduct a range of common ROC curve analyses for biomarker studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 895 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 6 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 861 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 191 21%
Researcher 160 18%
Student > Master 126 14%
Student > Bachelor 72 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 7%
Other 146 16%
Unknown 138 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 149 17%
Chemistry 120 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 103 12%
Engineering 31 3%
Other 164 18%
Unknown 172 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,485,191
of 25,008,338 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#46
of 1,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,568
of 290,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,008,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.