You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Simulating the impacts of disturbances on forest carbon cycling in North America: Processes, data, models, and challenges
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1029/2010jg001585 |
Authors |
Shuguang Liu, Ben Bond‐Lamberty, Jeffrey A. Hicke, Rodrigo Vargas, Shuqing Zhao, Jing Chen, Steven L. Edburg, Yueming Hu, Jinxun Liu, A. David McGuire, Jingfeng Xiao, Robert Keane, Wenping Yuan, Jianwu Tang, Yiqi Luo, Christopher Potter, Jennifer Oeding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 23% |
Researcher | 53 | 23% |
Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
Other | 41 | 18% |
Unknown | 31 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 80 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 23% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 33 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 3 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 50 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#683,803
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#117
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,658
of 155,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#9
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.