↓ Skip to main content

Protein function prediction using domain families

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Protein function prediction using domain families
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s3-s5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Rentzsch, Christine A Orengo

Abstract

Here we assessed the use of domain families for predicting the functions of whole proteins. These 'functional families' (FunFams) were derived using a protocol that combines sequence clustering with supervised cluster evaluation, relying on available high-quality Gene Ontology (GO) annotation data in the latter step. In essence, the protocol groups domain sequences belonging to the same superfamily into families based on the GO annotations of their parent proteins. An initial test based on enzyme sequences confirmed that the FunFams resemble enzyme (domain) families much better than do families produced by sequence clustering alone. For the CAFA 2011 experiment, we further associated the FunFams with GO terms probabilistically. All target proteins were first submitted to domain superfamily assignment, followed by FunFam assignment and, eventually, function assignment. The latter included an integration step for multi-domain target proteins. The CAFA results put our domain-based approach among the top ten of 31 competing groups and 56 prediction methods, confirming that it outperforms simple pairwise whole-protein sequence comparisons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 95 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 22%
Computer Science 18 17%
Engineering 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#12,873,109
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,782
of 7,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,161
of 192,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#88
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.