↓ Skip to main content

Observing of interprofessional collaboration in simulation: A socio-material approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interprofessional Care, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Observing of interprofessional collaboration in simulation: A socio-material approach
Published in
Journal of Interprofessional Care, July 2016
DOI 10.1080/13561820.2016.1203297
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-130479
Authors

Sofia Nyström, Johanna Dahlberg, Håkan Hult, Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren

Abstract

Simulation exercises are becoming more common as an educational feature of the undergraduate training of health professionals. Not all students participate in these activities, but are assigned as observers of the actual simulation. This article presents a study that explored how social-material arrangements for observation of interprofessional collaboration in a simulated situation are enacted and how these observations are thematised and made relevant for learning. The empirical data consisted of 18 standardised video recordings of medical and nursing students observing their peer students simulate. Practice theory is used to show how observation is embodied, relational, and situated in social-material relations. The findings show two emerging ways of enacting observation-proximate observation and distant observation. The enactments are characterised by different socio-material arrangements concerning the location where the simulation took place and its material set-up as well as embodied "doings" and "relatings" between the observing students and instructors. The observing students are participating in a passive, normative position as an audience and as judges of what is correct professional behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Psychology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,786,495
of 24,989,834 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#383
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,037
of 372,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,989,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.