↓ Skip to main content

Current Concepts in Refractory Migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Current Concepts in Refractory Migraine
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11940-012-0206-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliott Schulman, Brian E. McGeeney

Abstract

The Refractory or Intractable Migraine (RM) patient has long been a challenge to all healthcare providers (HCP). Headache specialists have recognized this sub group of patients who remain refractory to treatment. Despite this recognition, there are no formal criteria that characterize RM. This article will attempt to provide treatment approaches, some scientifically based and others that are empiric. A reasonable goal is to lessen disability. Combining the various modalities will improve the chances for successful treatment. The foundation of treatment is an emphasis on wellness. This includes optimizing mood, minimizing stress, practicing good sleep hygiene, and avoiding triggers. All comorbid factors should be addressed, including sleep and mood disorders, chronic neck pain, and obesity. Preventive treatment is necessary in the majority of patients, and a plan for "rescue" approaches is essential. Avoiding medication overuse, particularly narcotics, is advisable. Additional options for treatment include onabotulinumtoxinA, and more invasive modalities, such as neurostimulation. Adjunct treatment including supplements and relaxation may also be considered. Keeping a headache calendar is almost mandatory in management with attention to particular headache triggers, patterns and medication overuse (MOH). A trusting physician-patient relationship is also very important and will enhance compliance and foster communication. Patients often lapse from the management plan and the treating physician should be open minded about continuing care. RM is a long-term disease and requires close physician-patient interaction and cooperation for management of the problem. In those RM patients with multiple comorbidities, a multidisciplinary team should optimize management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 29%
Psychology 10 8%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,267,294
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#300
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,696
of 179,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.