↓ Skip to main content

Aerial roots of epiphytic orchids: the velamen radicum and its role in water and nutrient uptake

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Aerial roots of epiphytic orchids: the velamen radicum and its role in water and nutrient uptake
Published in
Oecologia, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2575-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard Zotz, Uwe Winkler

Abstract

The velamen radicum, a spongy, usually multiple epidermis of the roots, which at maturity consists of dead cells, is frequently described as an important adaptation of epiphytic orchids. Yet, quantitative evidence for the alleged functions, e.g., efficient water and nutrient uptake, nutrient retention, reduction of water loss, mechanical protection, or the avoidance of overheating, is rare or missing. We tested the notion originally put forward by Went in 1940 that the velamen allows plants to capture and immobilize the first solutions arriving in a rainfall, which are the most heavily charged with nutrients. In a series of experiments, we examined whether all necessary functional characteristics are given for this scenario to be realistic under ecological conditions. First, we show that the velamen of a large number of orchid species takes up solutions within seconds, while evaporation from the velamen takes several hours. Charged ions are retained in the velamen probably due to positive and negative charges in the cell walls, while uncharged compounds are lost to the external medium. Finally, we demonstrate that nutrient uptake follows biphasic kinetics with a highly efficient, active transport system at low external concentrations. Thus, our results lend strong support to Went's hypothesis: the velamen fulfills an important function in nutrient uptake in the epiphytic habitat. Most of the other functions outlined above still await similar experimental scrutiny.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 21%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 50%
Environmental Science 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Engineering 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 39 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,068,260
of 24,205,409 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#530
of 4,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,124
of 289,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,205,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.