You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and initial validation of a simple clinical decision tool to predict the presence of heart failure in primary care: the MICE (Male, Infarction, Crepitations, Edema, MICE) rule
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Heart Failure, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs089 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea K. Roalfe, Jonathan Mant, Jenny A. Doust, Pelham Barton, Martin R. Cowie, Paul Glasziou, David Mant, Richard J. McManus, Roger Holder, Jonathan J. Deeks, Robert N. Doughty, Arno W. Hoes, Kate Fletcher, F.D. Richard Hobbs |
Abstract |
Diagnosis of heart failure in primary care is often inaccurate, and access to and use of echocardiography is suboptimal. This study aimed to develop and provisionally validate a clinical prediction rule to optimize referral for echocardiography of people identified in primary care with suspected heart failure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 24% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 62% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,344,451
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1,962
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,413
of 226,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#255
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.