↓ Skip to main content

Development and initial validation of a simple clinical decision tool to predict the presence of heart failure in primary care: the MICE (Male, Infarction, Crepitations, Edema, MICE) rule

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Heart Failure, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and initial validation of a simple clinical decision tool to predict the presence of heart failure in primary care: the MICE (Male, Infarction, Crepitations, Edema, MICE) rule
Published in
European Journal of Heart Failure, February 2014
DOI 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea K. Roalfe, Jonathan Mant, Jenny A. Doust, Pelham Barton, Martin R. Cowie, Paul Glasziou, David Mant, Richard J. McManus, Roger Holder, Jonathan J. Deeks, Robert N. Doughty, Arno W. Hoes, Kate Fletcher, F.D. Richard Hobbs

Abstract

Diagnosis of heart failure in primary care is often inaccurate, and access to and use of echocardiography is suboptimal. This study aimed to develop and provisionally validate a clinical prediction rule to optimize referral for echocardiography of people identified in primary care with suspected heart failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 62%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,344,451
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1,962
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,413
of 226,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#255
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.