You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fine-mapping identifies multiple prostate cancer risk loci at 5p15, one of which associates with TERT expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Molecular Genetics, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/hmg/ddt086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Edward J. Saunders, Daniel A. Leongamornlert, Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz, Tokhir Dadaev, Sarah Jugurnauth-Little, Helen Ross-Adams, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Silvia Halim, Roslin Russel, Alison M. Dunning, Craig Luccarini, Joe Dennis, David E. Neal, Freddie C. Hamdy, Jenny L. Donovan, Ken Muir, Graham G. Giles, Gianluca Severi, Fredrik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Christopher A. Haiman, Fredrick Schumacher, Brian E. Henderson, Loic Le Marchand, Sara Lindstrom, Peter Kraft, David J. Hunter, Susan Gapstur, Stephen Chanock, Sonja I. Berndt, Demetrius Albanes, Gerald Andriole, Johanna Schleutker, Maren Weischer, Federico Canzian, Elio Riboli, Tim J. Key, Ruth C. Travis, Daniele Campa, Sue A. Ingles, Esther M. John, Richard B. Hayes, Paul Pharoah, Kay-Tee Khaw, Janet L. Stanford, Elaine A. Ostrander, Lisa B. Signorello, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Dan Schaid, Christiane Maier, Walther Vogel, Adam S. Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Jan Lubinski, Lisa Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Jong Y. Park, Radka Kaneva, Jyotsna Batra, Amanda Spurdle, Judith A. Clements, Manuel R. Teixeira, Koveela Govindasami, Michelle Guy, Rosemary A. Wilkinson, Emma J. Sawyer, Angela Morgan, Ed Dicks, Caroline Baynes, Don Conroy, Stig E. Bojesen, Rudolf Kaaks, Daniel Vincent, François Bacot, Daniel C. Tessier, COGS-CRUK GWAS-ELLIPSE Initiative, Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons’ Section of Oncology, ProtecT Study Collaborators, The PRACTICAL Consortium, Douglas F. Easton, Rosalind A. Eeles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Professor | 19 | 14% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#383,949
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#35
of 8,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,510
of 214,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#2
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.