↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive Decision‐Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Reproductive Decision‐Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10897-016-0035-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L. Chan, Lauren N. C. Johnson, Mary D. Sammel, Laura DiGiovanni, Chan Voong, Susan M. Domchek, Clarisa R. Gracia

Abstract

Expanded genetic testing of BRCA mutations has led to identification of more reproductive-aged women who test positive for the mutation which might impact attitudes and decisions about relationships, childbearing and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND). A cross-sectional survey was administered to 1081 self-reported BRCA carriers to investigate how knowledge of BRCA status influences these issues. The mean age at BRCA test disclosure was 44 years and 36 % reported a personal history of cancer. Of 163 women who were unpartnered, 21.5 % felt more pressure to get married. Of 284 women whose families were not complete, 41 % reported that carrier status impacted their decision to have biological children. Women with a history of cancer were more likely to report that knowledge of BRCA+ status impacted their decision to have a child (OR 1.8, 95 % CI 1-3.2). Fifty-nine percent thought PGD should be offered to mutation carriers and 55.5 % thought PND should be offered. In conclusion, knowledge of BRCA status impacts attitudes regarding relationships and childbearing, and most carriers believe that PGD and PND should be offered to other carriers. This study suggests that BRCA carriers desire and would benefit from reproductive counseling after test disclosure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Psychology 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,252,242
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#94
of 1,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,617
of 313,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.