↓ Skip to main content

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Trap Overcomes Defects in Dendritic Cell Differentiation but Does Not Improve Antigen-Specific Immune Responses

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
51 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Trap Overcomes Defects in Dendritic Cell Differentiation but Does Not Improve Antigen-Specific Immune Responses
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, August 2007
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-0409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingo Fricke, Noweeda Mirza, Jakob Dupont, Craig Lockhart, Autumn Jackson, Ji-Hyun Lee, Jeffrey A. Sosman, Dmitry I. Gabrilovich

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 67 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,708,493
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#6,940
of 12,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,858
of 68,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#63
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.