Title |
Isoforms of human O-GlcNAcase show distinct catalytic efficiencies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biochemistry, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1134/s0006297910070175 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jing Li, Cai-luan Huang, Lian-wen Zhang, Lin Lin, Zhong-hua Li, Fu-wu Zhang, Peng Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 17% |
Chemistry | 4 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,674,193
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#7,448
of 22,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,767
of 105,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#41
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.