↓ Skip to main content

Automatic segmentation of airway tree based on local intensity filter and machine learning technique in 3D chest CT volume

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Automatic segmentation of airway tree based on local intensity filter and machine learning technique in 3D chest CT volume
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11548-016-1492-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qier Meng, Takayuki Kitasaka, Yukitaka Nimura, Masahiro Oda, Junji Ueno, Kensaku Mori

Abstract

Airway segmentation plays an important role in analyzing chest computed tomography (CT) volumes for computerized lung cancer detection, emphysema diagnosis and pre- and intra-operative bronchoscope navigation. However, obtaining a complete 3D airway tree structure from a CT volume is quite a challenging task. Several researchers have proposed automated airway segmentation algorithms basically based on region growing and machine learning techniques. However, these methods fail to detect the peripheral bronchial branches, which results in a large amount of leakage. This paper presents a novel approach for more accurate extraction of the complex airway tree. This proposed segmentation method is composed of three steps. First, Hessian analysis is utilized to enhance the tube-like structure in CT volumes; then, an adaptive multiscale cavity enhancement filter is employed to detect the cavity-like structure with different radii. In the second step, support vector machine learning will be utilized to remove the false positive (FP) regions from the result obtained in the previous step. Finally, the graph-cut algorithm is used to refine the candidate voxels to form an integrated airway tree. A test dataset including 50 standard-dose chest CT volumes was used for evaluating our proposed method. The average extraction rate was about 79.1 % with the significantly decreased FP rate. A new method of airway segmentation based on local intensity structure and machine learning technique was developed. The method was shown to be feasible for airway segmentation in a computer-aided diagnosis system for a lung and bronchoscope guidance system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Engineering 15 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,823,285
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#589
of 850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,650
of 313,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 850 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.