↓ Skip to main content

Nutrition and Asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Nutrition and Asthma
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11882-012-0253-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphaëlle Varraso

Abstract

Over the past four decades, the prevalence of asthma has markedly increased in Westernized countries and countries transitioning to this lifestyle. It has been hypothesized that these increases are a consequence of changing environmental and/or behavioral factors. The modification of dietary habits (ie, decreased intake of fruits/vegetables and increased intake of "Westernized" processed foods) and a decrease in sun exposure have led to decreased intake of antioxidant vitamins and fatty acids and to decreased circulating levels of vitamin D, and have been proposed to explain the rise in asthma prevalence. This article summarizes the main findings on foods and nutrients connected to asthma based on several exhaustive recent reviews on the topic, and examines the evidence for an effect of dietary patterns on asthma. Overall, findings underscore the importance of conducting prospective studies and clinical trials to better understand the role of diet in the etiology of asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 143 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 23%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 13 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 39 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,148,931
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#474
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,151
of 155,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.