↓ Skip to main content

Hypotheses concerning the decline and poor recovery of Pacific herring in Prince William Sound, Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Hypotheses concerning the decline and poor recovery of Pacific herring in Prince William Sound, Alaska
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11160-011-9225-7
Authors

Walter H. Pearson, Richard B. Deriso, Ralph A. Elston, Sharon E. Hook, Keith R. Parker, Jack W. Anderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Colombia 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 50%
Environmental Science 15 17%
Chemistry 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,895,689
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#156
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,723
of 113,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them