You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endogenous Retrotransposition Activates Oncogenic Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruchi Shukla, Kyle R. Upton, Martin Muñoz-Lopez, Daniel J. Gerhardt, Malcolm E. Fisher, Thu Nguyen, Paul M. Brennan, J. Kenneth Baillie, Agnese Collino, Serena Ghisletti, Shruti Sinha, Fabio Iannelli, Enrico Radaelli, Alexandre Dos Santos, Delphine Rapoud, Catherine Guettier, Didier Samuel, Gioacchino Natoli, Piero Carninci, Francesca D. Ciccarelli, Jose Luis Garcia-Perez, Jamila Faivre, Geoffrey J. Faulkner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Belgium | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 340 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 25% |
| Researcher | 89 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 147 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 106 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 52 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,358,853
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#6,120
of 17,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,706
of 210,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#68
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.