| Title |
Tropical Peat Accumulation in Central Amazonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wetlands, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13157-013-0406-0 |
| Authors |
Outi Lähteenoja, Bernardo Flores, Bruce Nelson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,216,719
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#44
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,340
of 197,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them