| Title |
The unappreciated, fundamentally analytical nature of taxonomy and the implications for the inventory of biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-013-0472-x |
| Authors |
Ronald Sluys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Professor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,237,736
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#769
of 2,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,363
of 202,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.