↓ Skip to main content

The anisotropic nature of the human vocal fold: an ex vivo study

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
The anisotropic nature of the human vocal fold: an ex vivo study
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00405-013-2428-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna-Katharina Rohlfs, Eric Goodyer, Till Clauditz, Markus Hess, Malte Kob, Susan Koops, Klaus Püschel, Frank W. Roemer, Frank Müller

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the relationship between the shear elastic properties of vocal fold with respect to the direction of applied stress. There is extensive published material that quantifies the shear viscoelastic properties of the vocal fold, but as much of these data were obtained using rotating parallel plate rheometers, which are unable to resolve out difference of the shear elastic behaviour with respect to direction, there is very little data that indicates anisotropic behaviour. To overcome this gap in knowledge, the team devised an apparatus that is capable of applying a shear stress in a known direction. A series of measurements were taken at the mid-membranous position, in the transverse and longitudinal directions. Point-specific measurements were performed using fourteen human cadaver excised larynges, which were hemi-sectioned to expose the vocal fold. An extremely low sinusoidal shear force of 1 g was applied tangentially to the membrane surface in both the longitudinal and transverse direction, and the resultant shear strain was measured. With the probe applied to the intact vocal fold, the average ratio of the elasticity in the transverse with respect to the longitudinal direction was 0.55. Further investigation using histological staining of collagens in the lamina propria indicates that there is a visible difference in the general alignment of collagen fibres when comparing the coronal and the sagittal sections. Our conclusion is that there is a quantifiable difference between the shear elastic response of the lamina propria in the longitudinal and transverse directions, and that this could be explained by the difference in alignment of collagen fibres within the lamina propria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Professor 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2,008
of 3,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,957
of 197,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#41
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,039 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.